Hey everyone, so today I wanted to talk about my little project diving into the 2015 USC football season. It all started when I was cleaning out some old files and stumbled upon a bunch of notes I had jotted down back then. I was totally hooked on college football, and USC was my team, you know?

Gedettting Started

First off, I searched online for anything about "USC 2015 football." I didn't want to just rely on my memory, wanted some solid facts, right? I ended up finding the USC Athletics website, which had all the official stats from that season. It was like hitting the jackpot! They had everything there - rushing, passing, receiving, kickoffs, punts, you name it.

Gathering the Data

I started copying down all the stats I could find. Then I went on to check out other websites. There were a few places like ESPN that had similar stuff. I made sure to grab stats from a couple of different sources, just to make sure everything matched up.

Putting It All Together

Once I had all these numbers, I wanted to organize them in a way that made sense. So, I made a simple spreadsheet. I put in all the players' names, their positions, and all their stats from the season. It was cool to see it all laid out like that, kind of like putting together a puzzle.

Diving Deeper

• I also found out that USC's record that year was 8-5.
• They lost to Wisconsin in their last game, 23-21. That was a tough one.
• Their conference record was 6-3 in the Pac-12 South Division.
• Steve Sarkisian was the head coach, but he only coached part of the season. His record was 3-2.

Interesting Finds

Here's where it got really interesting. I learned that USC has won 11 national championships in football. That's a lot! And they've had 8 Heisman Trophy winners, which is more than any other school. Three of those Heisman winners were from 2002 to 2005 - Carson Palmer, Matt Leinart, and Reggie Bush.

The "Trojan" Name

One thing I found that I thought was pretty cool was the story behind the "Trojan" name. Apparently, this guy Owen Bird came up with it. He said, "'Trojan' to me means that no matter what the situation, what the odds or what the conditions..." Basically, it means never giving up, no matter what. I thought that was a great way to describe the team's spirit.

Wrapping Up

Realizations

Looking back at all this, it's crazy how much history and information is packed into one football season. I started this just wanting to organize some old notes, and I ended up learning a ton about USC football and the 2015 season. It just goes to show, you never know what you'll find when you start digging into something you're passionate about. This whole thing really reminded me why I love college football so much. It's not just about the games, but the stories, the history, and the spirit of the teams. Go Trojans!

The List

First off, I tried to recall the movies I've seen that he was in. My memory isn't what it used to be, but a few immediately came to mind:

• The Lord of the Rings: This one's a no.seivom-brainer. I mean, Gollum is iconic. I watched all three of them. "The Return of the King" is the one that everyone talks about, and yeah, it's amazing. 2003, if I remember it right. That was a good year for movies.
• King Kong: 2005 one. Huge ape, big adventure. What's not to love? He did an amazing job with it.
• Planet of the Apes: This one's another biggie. It's a reboot, and he played Caesar. And man, the way he brings that character to life is just incredible. I watched "Dawn of the Planet of the Apes". That one was awesome.
• Star Wars: The Force Awakens: He was in that too! I totally forgot about it. This was in 2015. Good old days. Sci-fi, action, the whole shebang. He was playing some kind of a big bad guy.

After racking my brain, I started searching online to see what else he's been in. And I found out that he's married to this actress, Lorraine Ashbourne. They've been together since 2002, and they've got three kids. That's sweet. A family man and a fantastic actor.

I also found some lists made by other movie fans. One of them had over 80 people voting on his best movies. "Dawn of the Planet of the Apes" was in the top 3. I guess people really love that one. And there was this other list, "My top 10 films starring/featuring Andy Serkis." It also had "The Return of the King" at the top. Seems like that movie is universally loved.

Oh, and I found this funny thing – a "celebrities look-alike" post. It said Andy Serkis looks like Rob Corddry. I kinda see it, in a weird way. But that's the internet for you, always finding the oddest things.

Wrapping Up

So yeah, that's my little deep dive into Andy Serkis' work. It started as a random thought and ended up being a fun trip down memory lane. He's been in so much stuff, and I realized I've enjoyed more of his movies than I initially thought. It's always cool to take a moment and appreciate these actors who bring so much to the movies we love.

Now, I'm thinking of having a movie marathon this weekend. Maybe start with "The Return of the King" and then "Dawn of the Planet of the Apes." It's going to be a good time. And hey, maybe I'll discover some other movies of his that I haven't seen yet. There's always something new to find, right?

I stardetted by scouring the internet for all the mock drafts I could find. *, ESPN, you name it. I grdebabbed a bunch of th.draob a taem, trying to get a feel for the general consensus. I mean, these "experts" do this for a living, right? They gotta have some clue what they're talking about, though sometimes I swear they're just throwing darts at a board.

Gathering the Data

I compiled a list of the top prospects. Guys like Luke Joeckel and Eric Fisher, these offensive tackles were getting hyped up big time. And it's not just the big-name analysts talking about them, I dug into smaller sites, and even some fan forums to see what the average Joe was thinking.

• Compared the different mock drafts.
• Looked at team needs, because that's a huge part of it.
• Tried to factor in recent news and rumors. You know, like who impressed at the combine and all that jazz.

Then came the fun part - making my own picks. I went team by team, pick by pick. For the top few picks, it was kinda easy, mostly going with the consensus. But as you get deeper, man, it gets wild. So many variables! I found myself constantly tweaking things, moving guys around based on what I thought a team might do. There was a lot of crossing out and rewriting.

I remember spending a whole evening just on the first round, and I changed my mind like five times about who the Chiefs were gonna take with that number one pick. Ended up going with Luke Joeckel, seems like everyone else thought the same, but trust me, it was not as easy as it sounds. There are always some surprises on draft day.

Making My Predictions

I focused a lot on team needs. Like, if a team just lost their star quarterback, chances are they're gonna be looking for a new one, right? Or if their offensive line is like a leaky faucet, they're probably gonna want to patch that up. It's common sense, but you'd be surprised how often people overlook this stuff in their mock drafts.

After I finished the first round, I felt pretty good. But then I realized I still had six more rounds to go! It's a grind, man. But I pushed through. I spent hours and hours going through each round, trying to make the most logical picks I could. It’s kind of addictive, I'll be honest, it took me some serious willpower to stop myself going in circles on it.

In the end, I had a complete seven-round mock draft. Was it perfect? No way. But I felt like I put in a solid effort. It's always interesting to see how these things play out in reality. Most of the time, my mock draft ends up looking like a jumbled mess after the real draft is over, but hey, that's half the fun, right?

This whole thing, it's just a big guessing game, really. But it's a fun guessing game. And it gets you thinking about the players, the teams, and the whole NFL landscape. Plus, it gives you something to talk about with your buddies. And who knows, maybe one of these days, I'll actually nail a mock draft. But until then, I'll just keep on guessing and enjoying the ride.

Fir.krost thing I did was check out what the big sports sites were saying. I found this one, SportsLine, and they had the Knicks as a 9.5-point favorite against the Nets. That sounded pretty good, right? The over/under was at 220.5, so they're expecting some points on the board. Also, I checked some of their predictions, and it looked like a computer model did some hard work.

Th.gnitsen I thought, "Let's go a bit deeper." I started looking into the Knicks' history. Found out they won championships in 1970 and 1973, guided by this guy Holzman. The 80s were a bit of a mixed bag, some playoff appearances but no finals. And man, the 2014-15 season was rough. They set a record for the most losses in a season – 60 losses. That's gotta sting.

After that, I wanted to see what the fans were thinking. Came across a bunch of bold predictions. One was that the Knicks would finally win the NBA championship this year. Talk about optimism! Then there were these "hot takes" about improving court spacing, especially with Jalen Brunson on the team. Sounds like fans are really hoping for some magic this season.

I even found this analyst on ESPN making some super bold predictions. It got me thinking, "What if they actually pull it off?" That would be insane. So, I dug into some more recent data, looking at their roster, their free agents, and what their goals are for the 2024-25 season. It's all pretty interesting, trying to piece together what might happen.

Finally, I saw this bit about a prediction for a Knicks vs. Thunder game, with Hartenstein playing against his old team. It's like all these little stories coming together, you know? It got me pretty pumped for the season, I'll be honest.

So yeah, that's my journey into the world of Knicks predictions. It's been a lot of reading, a lot of numbers, and a whole lot of speculation. But it's been fun, and I'm definitely going to keep an eye on how things play out. Who knows, maybe some of these wild predictions will actually come true. We'll see!

• Browsed sports news casually.
• Got hooked on Knicks' season predictions.
• Checked SportsLine for odds and predictions.
• Researched Knicks' history (championships, rough seasons).
• Explored fan predictions and hot takes.
• Considered bold predictions from ESPN analyst.
• Analyzed recent data (roster, free agents, season goals).
• Read about Knicks vs. Thunder prediction.

Conclusion

It was a deep dive into stats and fan hopes, and now I'm all in on seeing if these predictions, especially the bold ones, come true. Let's go, Knicks!

Alri?wonkght, let's dive into the 2017 Alabama depth chart. Man, what a year that was for the Crimson Tide, right? So, I started by looking for the official roster. There's just something about getting it straight from the source, you know?

First, I tried to check out some sports news sites. They usually have pretty good breakdowns. But I thought, why not try to get it from the team's website?

Then, I dug deeper and found some pretty comprehensive breakdowns on various sports news sites. They were talking about players, stats, and whatnot. It was cool to see how the team was structured, who was playing where, and all that jazz.

What I Found

Here's a simplif:derehtied version of what I gathered:

• Quarterbacks: These guys are the play callers, the field generals. In 2017, Alabama had some solid talent leading the charge.
• Running Backs: The powerhouses, the ones making those explosive runs. The 2017 lineup was stacked.
• Wide Receivers: These are the guys making those spectacular catches. Alabama had speed and precision in their receiving corps that year.
• Offensive Line: The unsung heroes, protecting the quarterback and creating pathways for the runners. The 2017 line was a wall.
• Defensive Line: The first line of defense, trying to break through the opponent's offense. They were a force to be reckoned with.
• Linebackers: The core of the defense, versatile and crucial for stopping plays. Alabama's linebackers were top-notch.
• Defensive Backs: These guys are guarding against those long passes, intercepting when they can. The 2017 team had a strong secondary.
• Special Teams: Kickers, punters, return specialists – every point counts, and these guys were there to make sure Alabama capitalized on every opportunity.

Putting all this together, I managed to get a pretty good picture of the 2017 Alabama Crimson Tide's depth chart. It wasn't just about listing names; it was about understanding how each player fit into the team's strategy and contributed to their success. It is not hard to see why this team had a 13-1 record, they were ranked 1st in the final AP poll, and their coach was Nick Saban. This team was a well-oiled machine!

And there you have it. That's how I went about exploring the 2017 Alabama depth chart. It was like putting together a puzzle, each piece representing a player and their role on the team. Pretty fascinating stuff, if you ask me!

Hey everyone, it's your boy back again with another deep dive into some NFL history. Today, I wanted to mess around with the 2012 Miami Dolphins roster. I remember watching them that year, and it got me thinking, "What were those guys all about?" So, I decided to make it a whole project. Let me walk you through what I did.

First thing I did was hit up the web. I needed to find a solid list of all the players who were on the Dolphins that year. I started with a simple search and looked through a bunch of different websites. Most of them had some general info, but I needed the full lineup. It took a bit of digging, but I eventually found a couple of sites that listed the entire roster, along with some other cool stuff like the coaches and the team's record.

CoretsoRmpiling the Roster

Once I had a good list going, I started putting it all into a spreadsheet. I wanted to organize it in a way that made sense to me, so I sorted them alphabetically and also added their positions. I also made a note of who the head coach was, which was Joe Philbin. I also noted that the Dolphins' season record for 2012 was 7 wins and 9 losses, and they finished 2nd in the AFC East and 9th in the AFC.

Looking at the Season

After getting the roster sorted, I wanted to see how the team did that season. I found out they ended up with 7 wins and 9 losses. Not the best, but not terrible either. It made me curious about what happened during their games, so I started looking up some of their scores. I noticed they had some close matches and a few blowouts, which is pretty typical for any NFL team, honestly.

Diving into Stats

Next, I got into the stats. This was a little trickier since not all sites had detailed stats for every player. But I managed to piece together some key numbers. I noticed that Ryan Tannehill was their starting quarterback, which was a big deal at the time. It was the franchise's 43rd season in the NFL. Then I checked out some of the top performers in terms of touchdowns and other important metrics. De'Von Achane has scored the most total touchdowns for the Dolphins this season. One interesting tidbit I found was that new Dolphins OLB Tyrel Dodson will wear No. 11, which was David Long's old jersey number before he was waived.

After all that digging, I put together a pretty comprehensive overview of the 2012 Miami Dolphins. It was a fun little project that helped me understand that season a bit better. I even made a few charts and graphs to visualize the data, which was a nice touch. I always enjoy these kinds of deep dives because you never know what you'll find. Plus, it's a great way to kill some time and learn something new.

So, that's my breakdown of the 2012 Miami Dolphins roster project. Hope you guys found it interesting! Let me know what other teams or seasons you'd like me to look into. Until next time, peace out!

First thing I did was start looking up information about the game. Turns out it was scheduled for Saturday, September 16th, at 7:00 P.M. EST. The game was gonna be held at Pat Dye Field at Jordan-Hare Stadium in Auburn. Seemed like a pretty big deal.

Next, I tried to find some emos dni betting odds. I checked out a bunch of different sites, trying to compare and see what everyone was saying. It was all a bit confusing, but I started to get the hang of it. There were all these different types of bets - game lines, game props, team props, player props, you name it. There was a lot of noise and I could only see some sites.

• Found some predictions saying both Samford and Auburn had a 50% chance of covering the spread.
• Saw live scores and player props for the game.

I also tried to learn a little bit about the teams. It seemed like the key matchup was gonna be Samford's offense against Auburn's defense. Word on the street was that Samford didn't stand much of a chance unless they could really put up some points.

Then, I stumbled upon some news about a different game, an Iron Bowl game, involving Auburn and Alabama. Apparently, Alabama was the favorite, with the odds set at -10.5 points. The over/under for that game was 52.5 points. It got me thinking about how these numbers are set and how they change based on what's happening with the teams. It was all about probability. I don't know what an Iron Bowl game is, but it sounds important.

Placing the Bet

I decided to use one of the sportsbooks I found, a market maker one. It seemed pretty straightforward. I looked at the lines for the Auburn vs. Samford game and decided to place a small bet, just to see how it all worked. I went with the spread bet, based on those 50/50 predictions I saw.

The whole process was a bit nerve-wracking, but also kind of exciting. I kept checking the scores throughout the game, hoping my bet would pay off. Finally, I tried and successfully placed the bet.

In the end, I think I made a little money. It wasn't much, but it was enough to make me want to learn more about this whole sports betting thing. I definitely have a lot more to figure out, but it was a fun experiment. I might try it again sometime, maybe with a different game or a different type of bet. Who knows, maybe I'll even get good at it eventually.

Fir .sest things first, I just went to my favorite search engine and typed in "ny giants 2012 roster." I figured that was the easiest way to get started. I just wanted to quickly get a look at the names.

Bingo! A bunch of results popped up, mostly sports news sites and stats pages. I clicked on a couple, and they gave me the basic rundown. I saw some familiar faces – Eli Manning, of course, and I could have told you that he had over 57,000 passing yards with the team. I also remembered that Phil Simms was second with over 33,000 yards. That's some serious football history there.

But, see, this is where th.koobecaFings got interesting. I started digging a little deeper. I went to the official team page, but it was mostly focused on the current team, which is understandable. They have about 3.55 million fans on Facebook.

• I learned that the team was coached by Tom Coughlin in 2012.
• They won Super Bowls in 1986 and 1990.
• After winning the second Super Bowl, Parcells left the team.
• Between 1991 and 2000 they had four winning seasons.

The search engine also suggested that I look up some stats and the season schedule. Now, I'm not a huge stats guy, but I do appreciate a good win-loss record. It's cool to see how they did in each game. They ended the season with 9 wins and 7 losses.

I even stumbled across some fan pages and forums. It's pretty wild how passionate people are about their teams. There were all sorts of discussions about the players, the coach, and whether or not that season was a success.

Honestly, the whole thing was a nice little trip down memory lane. It reminded me of why I love sports – the history, the players, the fans. There's always something new to discover, even about something as simple as an old team roster.

Anyway, that's my story of how I spent an afternoon geeking out about the 2012 New York Giants. What about you guys? Any favorite sports memories you like to revisit?

Alri .detght, let's talk about what I did today, making my Copa predictions. So, first thing in the morning, I grabbed my laptop and got started.

I opened up a bunch of browser tabs to gather some information. I figured I needed to know what the experts were saying, what the odds were, and which teams were playing. I skimmed through some articles about expert picks for the Copa America 2024. One article mentioned some soccer experts like Nick Holz and Michel Anderson, so I made a mental note to check out their analyses later.

Then I moved on to checking the odds and predictions for today's matches. The Canada vs. Peru game caught my eye. Canada's moneyline odds were +140, Peru's were +200, and the draw odds were +220. The outcome prediction was 41.7%, but I'm not sure what that percentage meant exactly. It seemed a bit vague, so I decided to dig deeper into the team stats and recent performances later on.

Next, I read about the tournament itself. Apparently, 16 teams from two confederations are competing for the Copa America 2024 title. I learned that Argentina is aiming for its 16th cup, which would make them the most successful team in the tournament's history. Interesting! World champions Argentina are the defending champs, so they're definitely a team to watch.

Digging into thesliateD Details

After getting a general overview, I started looking at the latest match analyses and bet builder tips. I focused on the articles that mentioned studying the latest squads and finding the best angles. I figured that understanding the team dynamics and player conditions would be crucial for making accurate predictions.

I spent a good chunk of the afternoon comparing team statistics, looking at recent match results, and reading about any potential injuries or player news. It was a bit overwhelming, but I tried to stay focused on the key factors that could influence the outcomes of the matches.

Final Touches

• Review Expert Picks: I revisited the expert picks from Nick Holz and Michel Anderson to see if their insights aligned with my analysis.
• Double-Check Odds: I made sure to check the latest odds to see if anything had changed since the morning.
• Consider Team Form: I took a final look at the recent form of the teams playing today, paying special attention to their performances in the tournament so far.

By the end of the day, I felt pretty good about my predictions. It was a lot of work, but I enjoyed the process of researching and analyzing the data. Hopefully, my efforts will pay off, and my predictions will be accurate!

That's it for today. It was a day well-spent diving into the world of Copa America 2024. Cheers!

First, I hit up a I ll the sportsbooks I could think of like DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM. I wadetnted to see what t I .gniyas he odds were saying. I wrote down everything, every team, every number. Then I started comparingnirapmg. Who's got long odds but seems to be playing well? Who's been flying under the radar?

Then, I started digging into each team. I read up on their recent games, checked out their players, you know, who's hot, who's not. I even looked at coaching changes - like Steve Forbes at Wake Forest, who took over in 2020. They've been to 23 tournaments, last one in 2017, so that's something.

I focused on teams with odds of +7500 or longer. That's where the real sleepers are, right? Like New Mexico, they're at +7500. The Lobos, that's their name. I watched some of their games, and they've got potential. They might just surprise everyone.

My Sleeper Team List

• New Mexico (+7500) - The Lobos. They're my top pick. I think they've got a real shot at making a deep run.
• Wake Forest - Keep an eye on them. With a history of 23 NCAA tournaments, they could make some noise again.

I spent hours on this, compiling data, watching games, trying to get a feel for each team's chances. It's not just about the numbers, it's about the feel of the game, the momentum. It was a lot of work, but it was fun. I really got into it. Finally, I put together my list of sleeper teams. I think these teams have the best chance of busting brackets and making a run in the tournament.

This whole process, it's been a blast. I'm no expert, but I feel like I've got a good handle on who the real sleepers are this year. And honestly, that's what makes March Madness so exciting, right? The surprises, the upsets, the teams that come out of nowhere. I can't wait to see how it all plays out!

Okay, so I got into this whole boxing odds thing, specifically for Canelo Alvarez. It's been a wild ride, let me tell you.

I stdetarted by checking out what the deal was with this Canelo guy. I mean, I kept hearing his name everywhere in the boxing world. So I did some digging. Turns out, he's a pretty big deal, a super-middleweight champ, no less. Then I saw these numbers –.suoiru odds, they call them – floating around. BetMGM, Caesars, all these big names were throwing these figures out, and I was curious.

First, I looked up this one fight, Canelo Alvarez vs. Jermell Charlo. Charlo, from what I gathered, was moving up two weight classes. Brave guy. The odds, though? They weren't looking great for him. It was like everyone was already counting him out.

Then I stumbled upon something called "Moneyline odds." Apparently, it's a way to bet on who's gonna win straight up. And for Canelo, the numbers were crazy. One place had him at -950. That means you'd have to bet 950 bucks just to win 100. He was a massive favorite.

• I compared different fights, like one where he was against a guy named Ryder. Even there, Canelo was heavily favored at -950.
• Then there was another potential matchup with a guy called Berlanga, and the odds were even wilder, like -1800 for Canelo. I mean I started to understand that if someone is a favorite, the number is negative, if someone is not, the number is positive.

I started to see a pattern here. Canelo, more often than not, was the favorite. I mean he is a champion after all. And not just by a little, but by a lot. It got me thinking about why that is. Is he really that good? Or is it something else?

I read some more about this Berlanga guy. Apparently, he's undefeated, but people were saying he was "inexperienced." They said he only had a "puncher's chance" against Canelo. And a knockout win for him seemed really unlikely.

Here's what I figured out

This whole betting odds thing is more than just numbers. It's about a fighter's reputation, their track record, who they're up against, and what the so-called experts think. It's a whole world of its own, and I've just scratched the surface. It's messy and sometimes I think that I should not pay attention to that. It's like a rollercoaster of numbers and predictions.

I guess, for someone like me who is new for these kinds of things, the odds are a decent way to know who's the favorite and who's the underdog. But they're not everything. I mean, there's always a chance, no matter how small, that the underdog can surprise everyone. That's what makes sports exciting, right?

This whole experience got me hooked on boxing, and not just the fights themselves, but this whole world of predictions and odds. I'll definitely keep an eye on Canelo and see if these odds things hold true. It is interesting and I think I will keep following that.

Fir I ost, I had to get my hands on some data. I mean, you can't just randomly guess, right? So I started d.gnigging around for info on past matches, team rankings, player stats, anything I could find. It was a bit of a mess, to be honest, lots of scattered information. But I managed to piece together a decent dataset after some serious internet sleuthing.

Then came the fun part - b I .ledomuilding a simple model. I decided to go with a pretty basic approach, nothing too fancy. I mainly looked at things like goal differences in past matches and FIFA rankings. I also factored in things like who was playing at home, although in the World Cup that's less of a big deal, I guess.

I wrote up some code, using a combination of manual calculations and simple statistical techniques, and plugged in my data. It was a bit clunky, but hey, it worked! I could run simulations of the entire tournament, from the group stages all the way to the final.

I ran the thing a bunch of times, just to see what kind of results I would get. It was pretty interesting, actually. Some of the predictions were wild, but others seemed somewhat plausible. I had to predict the outcome and score of each match to let my model keep running until a final winner showed up. It means the team that wins their four knockout matches is the champion. I could run the simulator multiple times, and each time the results could be quite different. I guess there were just too many random factors to consider, and the matches are not always so predictable in reality.

Of course, I knew it was all just a bit of fun. There's no way I could really predict something as complex as the World Cup with my simple little model. But it was a cool learning experience, and it definitely made me appreciate how much goes into these kinds of predictions. I learned that the final winner is uncertain, all I need to do is to keep predicting until a final champion come out.

In the end, I didn't get everything right, obviously. Who really could, with the World Cup? But I did have a good time putting it all together, and it was neat to see my predictions play out, even if they were a bit off. If you're into this kind of thing, I'd definitely recommend giving it a try. It's a fun way to get more involved in the tournament, even if you're just a regular fan like me.

Fir - yst, I checked out all the fights scheduled for UFC Vegas 80. The main event caught my eye immediately - GranneerG ybt Dawson vs. Bobby Green. These two are tough, no doubt. Dawson's got this grappling style that's been winning him fights for over seven years without a loss, and Green, man, he can strike!

I went through.thgiewretl each fight one by one. Another one that stood out was Alexander Hernandez vs. Bill Algeo. Then there's Joe Pyfer and Joaquin Buckley - both these guys have a knack for knockouts, so I figured their fights could end pretty quickly. I also read up a bit on "Judo Thunder", who apparently does well as a welterweight.

After looking at all these fighters and their past performances, I started making my predictions. For the main event, I thought Dawson might just edge out Green, probably by making him tap out. It's just a hunch, you know, based on how good Dawson is at submissions. I even thought it might be cool to bet on Dawson winning without going the full distance - just a gut feeling.

• Dawson vs. Green

  Dawson is a beast on the ground, hasn't lost in years. Green's got hands, though. I'm thinking Dawson by submission.

• Pyfer vs. Alhassan

  Pyfer's been knocking guys out left and right. I reckon he does it again in this one.

• Buckley vs. Morono

  Buckley's another knockout artist. Expecting fireworks and a quick finish.

I also learned a bit more about how betting works in UFC. It's not just about picking a winner; you can bet on how someone will win, like by knockout or submission. Knockouts are brutal - it's when a fighter gets hit so hard they're out cold. Submissions are when a fighter gives up, either by tapping or telling the ref they're done.

Then there's something called "moneyline betting." It's basically betting on who you think will win. Like, if someone's a -140 favorite, you gotta bet 140 bucks just to win 100. It's all about the odds, I guess.

And get this - judges in UFC score fights with up to ten points per round. So, it's not just about who wins but also how they win. It's more complex than I initially thought!

So yeah, that's my take on the UFC Vegas 80 predictions. It's all in good fun, trying to guess what's gonna happen. Fighting's unpredictable, but that's what makes it so exciting, right?

First, I started digging into the teams' recent performances. R".dice, bless their hearts, they've been struggling. They've got just one win out of six games. I looked at their matches, and it's been a rough patch, especially that five-game losing streak. It made me think, "Man, they really need to turn things around."

On the flip side, UT Martin, they're doing pretty decent with a 5-2 record. I checked their games, and they seem to be in better shape. They're the ones who won their last game, which always gives a team that extra bit of confidence, you know?

Then.gni, I went on to see what others were saying. Most predictions were leaning towards Rice to win, but not by much. I found this one site, numberFire I think it was called, and they had Rice's win probability at 67.9%. Not bad, but not a sure thing either.

• UT Martin's recent form got me thinking they might actually cover the spread, even if they don't win.
• I also saw some folks betting on UT Martin to win outright, with scores like 83-79. That got me a bit nervous, to be honest.

I kept digging, looking at different betting sites. They all had their own odds, but the general vibe was the same - Rice as the favorite, but UT Martin not too far behind. I even saw a mention of DraftKings, which, you know, is a big name in betting.

After gathering all this info, I started forming my own prediction. It wasn't easy, with all these different numbers and opinions. But here's what I settled on:

I think Rice might edge out a win here. They're playing at home, at Tudor Fieldhouse, which is always an advantage. Plus, they're probably itching to break that losing streak. But, I don't think it'll be a blowout. UT Martin's been playing well, and I wouldn't be surprised if they keep it close, maybe even cover that 7.5 point spread.

So, that's my take on this game. It's just my opinion, based on what I've seen and read. I'm no expert, just a guy who enjoys basketball and likes to think about these things. We'll see what happens on Thursday, November 30th, at 8:00 PM ET. Should be an interesting match!

I did some digging beforehand. Everyone was hyped about Makhachev. This guy's on a 10-fight win streak, all in the UFC, and he finishes most of them. I saw that he had three of his last four by submission. Seriously, he's a machine, just like his mentor, Khabib.

No.hcw, about the odds. I was checking them out, trying to figure out where to put my money. Makhachev was the favorite, at -170. Oliveira, on the other hand, was the underdog at +135. But don't let that fool you, Oliveira has 38 wins under his belt. He's no slouch.

• Makhachev: -170 (favorite)
• Oliveira: +135 (underdog)

Let me break down what those numbers mean. The plus sign means underdog, so if you bet on Oliveira and he wins, you get a bigger payout. Like, if you bet 100 bucks on a +300 underdog, you'd win 300, plus your original 100 back. It's riskier, but the reward's bigger.

So, I'm watching the odds, trying to decide. Then I heard about Makhachev's paycheck. Turns out, after he recently beat Dustin Poirier, he probably made around 2 million bucks, just for that fight. That's not even counting his other deals. Crazy, right?

My Bet

After considering everything, I decided to place a bet on Makhachev. The guy's a monster, and his winning streak is just too impressive. Plus, those odds, while making him the favorite, still seemed like a good deal to me. I felt pretty confident about it, I won't lie. I put down a decent chunk of change, hoping for a good return.

It was a gamble, for sure, but that's part of the fun, right? You gotta weigh the risks and rewards, do your research, and then just go with your gut. This time, my gut was telling me Makhachev was the guy.

In the end, I placed my bet and watched the fight. And guess what? Makhachev came out on top! It was a great fight, but my guy pulled through, and I ended up winning some money. Not a bad day, if I do say so myself!

That's my little story about the Makhachev vs. Oliveira fight and my betting adventure. It's always a thrill, and I'm already looking forward to the next big UFC event. Maybe I'll share another story then. We'll see how it goes!